[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16264979#comment-16264979
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18294:
----------------------------------------
bq.I think this is why the argument of increasing the existing default values
comes. Because our decision metric has changed.
Did not see Ram comment when I was writing. I mean reducing the existing def
values. Correct Ram? Ya with that alone the issues what is noticed in tests
can be solved, We noticed this as discussed in past. Just did not conclude
then whether to reduce the def.
Said that am still ok for on heap, continue with old way.
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18294
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Eshcar Hillel
> Assignee: Eshcar Hillel
> Attachments: HBASE-18294.01.patch, HBASE-18294.02.patch,
> HBASE-18294.03.patch, HBASE-18294.04.patch, HBASE-18294.05.patch,
> HBASE-18294.06.patch
>
>
> A region is flushed if its memory component exceed a threshold (default size
> is 128MB).
> A flush policy decides whether to flush a store by comparing the size of the
> store to another threshold (that can be configured with
> hbase.hregion.percolumnfamilyflush.size.lower.bound).
> Currently the implementation (in both cases) compares the data size
> (key-value only) to the threshold where it should compare the heap size
> (which includes index size, and metadata).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
