[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16274106#comment-16274106
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19340:
-----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 14m
7s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} patch {color} | {color:blue} 0m
1s{color} | {color:blue} The patch file was not named according to hbase's
naming conventions. Please see
https://yetus.apache.org/documentation/0.6.0/precommit-patchnames for
instructions. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-1.2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
24s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
28s{color} | {color:green} branch-1.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} branch-1.2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_152 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} branch-1.2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_161 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green} branch-1.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 2m
27s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} branch-1.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
22s{color} | {color:green} branch-1.2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_152 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} branch-1.2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_161 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_152 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_161 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} rubocop {color} | {color:red} 0m
10s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 38 new + 894 unchanged - 19 fixed
= 932 total (was 913) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} ruby-lint {color} | {color:red} 0m
13s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 21 new + 794 unchanged - 1 fixed =
815 total (was 795) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 2m
21s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
20m 29s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop
2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5 2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_152 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_161 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 1m
46s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 5m
55s{color} | {color:green} hbase-shell in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
14s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 56m 12s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:e77c578 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-19340 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12900159/HBASE-19340-branch-1.2.batch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense javac javadoc unit findbugs shadedjars
hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile rubocop ruby_lint |
| uname | Linux 74373ddd8ee2 3.13.0-129-generic #178-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 11
12:48:20 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
|
| git revision | branch-1.2 / 891db9a |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.0.5 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_161 |
| Multi-JDK versions | /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:1.8.0_152
/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_161 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| rubocop | v0.51.0 |
| rubocop |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10171/artifact/patchprocess/diff-patch-rubocop.txt
|
| ruby-lint | v2.3.1 |
| ruby-lint |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10171/artifact/patchprocess/diff-patch-ruby-lint.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10171/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-client hbase-shell U: . |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10171/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.6.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> SPLIT_POLICY and FLUSH_POLICY cann't be set directly by hbase shell
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-19340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19340
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.2.6
> Reporter: zhaoyuan
> Assignee: zhaoyuan
> Fix For: 1.2.8
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19340-branch-1.2.batch
>
>
> Recently I wanna try to alter the split policy for a table on my cluster
> which version is 1.2.6 and as far as I know The SPLIT_POLICY is an attribute
> of the HTable so I run the command in hbase shell console below.
> alter 'tablex',SPLIT_POLICY =>
> 'org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.DisabledRegionSplitPolicy'
> However, It gave the information like this and I confused
> Unknown argument ignored: SPLIT_POLICY
> Updating all regions with the new schema...
> So I check the source code That admin.rb might miss the setting for this
> argument .
> htd.setMaxFileSize(JLong.valueOf(arg.delete(MAX_FILESIZE))) if
> arg[MAX_FILESIZE]
> htd.setReadOnly(JBoolean.valueOf(arg.delete(READONLY))) if arg[READONLY]
> ...
> So I think it may be a bug ,is it?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
