[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16279913#comment-16279913
]
Umesh Agashe commented on HBASE-18962:
--------------------------------------
[~chancelq], can you explain why do you think
#resultOrExceptionBuilder.setException(pair) needs to be replaced with
builder#setException(pair)? I think this code is in doNonAtomicRegionMutation()
where following code is used even before these changes:
{code}
resultOrExceptionBuilder.setException(pair);
builder.addResultOrException(resultOrExceptionBuilder.build());
{code}
Check doBatchOp() call just before the code you have posted. Do you see any
issue with the current code?
> Support atomic BatchOperations through batchMutate()
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18962
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: regionserver
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-3
> Reporter: Umesh Agashe
> Assignee: Umesh Agashe
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-1
>
> Attachments: hbase-18962.master.001.patch,
> hbase-18962.master.002.patch, hbase-18962.master.003.patch,
> hbase-18962.master.004.patch
>
>
> Support all mutations in BatchOperations to be applied atomically (all or
> none) by locking all rows corresponding to mutations exclusively.
> mutateRows() which uses MultiRowMutationProcessor applies all mutations
> atomically and batchMutate() is non-atomic. To unify code paths, isAtomic()
> attribute can be added to BatchOperations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
