[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16298969#comment-16298969
 ] 

Jerry He commented on HBASE-19486:
----------------------------------

+1  Nice!  Good tests too.

nit.  Could you rename it to periodic flush or similar? If I recall, there is 
somewhere we use auto flush for a different meaning.

> Automatically flush BufferedMutator after a timeout 
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-19486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19486
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Client
>            Reporter: Niels Basjes
>            Assignee: Niels Basjes
>         Attachments: HBASE-19486-20171212-2117.patch, 
> HBASE-19486-20171218-1229.patch, HBASE-19486-20171218-1300.patch, 
> HBASE-19486-20171219-0933.patch, HBASE-19486-20171219-1026.patch, 
> HBASE-19486-20171219-1122-trigger-qa-run.patch, 
> HBASE-19486-20171220-1612-trigger-qa-run.patch
>
>
> I'm working on several projects where we are doing stream / event type 
> processing instead of batch type processing. We mostly use Apache Flink and 
> Apache Beam for these projects.
> When we ingest a continuous stream of events and feed that into HBase via a 
> BufferedMutator this all works fine. The buffer fills up at a predictable 
> rate and we can make sure it flushes several times per second into HBase by 
> tuning the buffer size.
> We also have situations where the event rate is unpredictable. Some times 
> because the source is in reality a batch job that puts records into Kafka, 
> sometimes because it is the "predictable in production" application in our 
> testing environment (where only the dev triggers a handful of events).
> For these kinds of use cases we need a way to 'force' the BufferedMutator to 
> automatically flush any records in the buffer even if the buffer is not full.
> I'll put up a pull request with a proposed implementation for review against 
> the master (i.e. 3.0.0).
> When approved I would like to backport this to the 1.x and 2.x versions of 
> the client in the same (as close as possible) way.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to