[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16304665#comment-16304665
]
stack commented on HBASE-18294:
-------------------------------
[~eshcar] Yeah, working on trying to figure whey ITBLL can't go big. This patch
may actually have improved things after all... I can go a bit bigger. Trying
more.
Also, I'm in favor of on and offheap working same way for now with accounting
being data+overhead until we have more experience running offheap (Waiting on
by-off by [~anoop.hbase] and/or [~ram_krish] on suggested change -- looks good
to me but the boys know this area better).
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18294
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Eshcar Hillel
> Assignee: Eshcar Hillel
> Attachments: HBASE-18294.01.patch, HBASE-18294.02.patch,
> HBASE-18294.03.patch, HBASE-18294.04.patch, HBASE-18294.05.patch,
> HBASE-18294.06.patch, HBASE-18294.07.patch, HBASE-18294.07.patch,
> HBASE-18294.08.patch, HBASE-18294.09.patch, HBASE-18294.10.patch,
> HBASE-18294.11.patch, HBASE-18294.11.patch, HBASE-18294.12.patch,
> HBASE-18294.13.patch
>
>
> A region is flushed if its memory component exceed a threshold (default size
> is 128MB).
> A flush policy decides whether to flush a store by comparing the size of the
> store to another threshold (that can be configured with
> hbase.hregion.percolumnfamilyflush.size.lower.bound).
> Currently the implementation (in both cases) compares the data size
> (key-value only) to the threshold where it should compare the heap size
> (which includes index size, and metadata).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
