[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16329603#comment-16329603
]
Umesh Agashe commented on HBASE-18965:
--------------------------------------
Sounds good [~stack]! Considering we would like to get this in 2.0 but beta-1
is feature freeze we can move it out of beta-2. Old implementation is left as
is but deprecated. Alternative API with examples can be added later. The
release note for HBASE-18964 already suggests to use coprocessors instead of
row processor.
> Create alternate API to processRowsWithLock() that doesn't take RowProcessor
> as an argument
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18965
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18965
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Coprocessors
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-3
> Reporter: Umesh Agashe
> Assignee: Umesh Agashe
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
>
> Create alternate API to processRowsWithLock() that doesn't take RowProcessor
> as an argument. Also write example showing how coprocessors and batchMutate()
> can be used instead of RowProcessors.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
