[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13202368#comment-13202368
]
Harsh J commented on HBASE-4072:
--------------------------------
Given that HBase does have its own zk config parts, should we just drop out
zoo.cfg read support? Its bought in more problems than a solution.
> zoo.cfg inconsistently used and sometimes we use non-zk names for zk
> attributes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4072
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: stack
>
> This issue was found by Lars:
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/n04sthNcji2/zoo.cfg+vs+hbase-site.xml&subj=Re+zoo+cfg+vs+hbase+site+xml
> Lets fix the inconsistency found and fix the places where we use non-zk
> attribute name for a zk attribute in hbase (There's only a few places that I
> remember -- maximum client connections is one IIRC)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
