[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16348156#comment-16348156
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19904:
-----------------------------------
Still this...
{noformat}
2018-02-01 05:24:03,383 WARN
[org.apache.hadoop.util.JvmPauseMonitor$Monitor@28dfc8b4]
util.JvmPauseMonitor$Monitor(191): Detected pause in JVM or host machine (eg
GC): pause of approximately 86471ms
GC pool 'PS MarkSweep' had collection(s): count=1 time=2377ms
GC pool 'PS Scavenge' had collection(s): count=1 time=83939ms
2018-02-01 05:24:03,448 WARN
[org.apache.hadoop.util.JvmPauseMonitor$Monitor@68ce687f]
util.JvmPauseMonitor$Monitor(191): Detected pause in JVM or host machine (eg
GC): pause of approximately 86035ms
GC pool 'PS MarkSweep' had collection(s): count=1 time=2377ms
GC pool 'PS Scavenge' had collection(s): count=1 time=83939ms
2018-02-01 05:24:03,383 WARN
[org.apache.hadoop.util.JvmPauseMonitor$Monitor@30cd2f5e]
util.JvmPauseMonitor$Monitor(191): Detected pause in JVM or host machine (eg
GC): pause of approximately 86397ms
GC pool 'PS MarkSweep' had collection(s): count=1 time=2377ms
GC pool 'PS Scavenge' had collection(s): count=1 time=83939ms
2018-02-01 05:24:03,383 WARN
[org.apache.hadoop.util.JvmPauseMonitor$Monitor@4ddbbfc0]
util.JvmPauseMonitor$Monitor(191): Detected pause in JVM or host machine (eg
GC): pause of approximately 86395ms
GC pool 'PS MarkSweep' had collection(s): count=1 time=2377ms
GC pool 'PS Scavenge' had collection(s): count=1 time=83939ms
{noformat}
> Find a better way to deal with the cyclic dependency when initializing WAL
> and Replication
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-19904
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19904
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Replication, wal
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19904-v3.patch, HBASE-19904-v3.patch
>
>
> When implementing synchronous replication, I found that we need to depend
> more on replication in WAL so it is even more pain...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
