[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Duo Zhang updated HBASE-20046:
------------------------------
         Priority: Major  (was: Blocker)
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.5.0)
                       (was: 2.0.0)
                   2.1.0
                   3.0.0
       Issue Type: New Feature  (was: Bug)

> Reconsider the implementation for serial replication
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-20046
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20046
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Replication
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0
>
>
> When implementing HBASE-9465 we added two new families to meta table, one is 
> rep meta and the other is rep_position. In general I think rep_meta is OK to 
> put into meta table since it records the open and close sequence id for a 
> region, but for rep_position, I think it should be put into another system 
> table instead of meta table.
> This should be done before we finally release 2.0.0 or 1.5.0.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to