[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16393547#comment-16393547
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-19216:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2
        [build #465 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/465/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/465//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/465//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/465//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> Implement a general framework to execute remote procedure on RS
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-19216
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19216
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: proc-v2, Replication
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-19216-v1.patch, HBASE-19216-v2.patch, 
> HBASE-19216.patch, HBASE-19216.patch, HBASE-19216.patch
>
>
> When building the basic framework for HBASE-19064, I found that the 
> enable/disable peer is built upon the watcher of zk.
> The problem of using watcher is that, you do not know the exact time when all 
> RSes in the cluster have done the change, it is a 'eventually done'. 
> And for synchronous replication, when changing the state of a replication 
> peer, we need to know the exact time as we can only enable read/write after 
> that time. So I think we'd better use procedure to do this. Change the flag 
> on zk, and then execute a procedure on all RSes to reload the flag from zk.
> Another benefit is that, after the change, zk will be mainly used as a 
> storage, so it will be easy to implement another replication peer storage to 
> replace zk so that we can reduce the dependency on zk.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to