[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16407772#comment-16407772
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-19024:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-1
        [build #256 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/256/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/256//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/256//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/256//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]




(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> Configurable default durability for synchronous WAL
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-19024
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19024
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wal
>            Reporter: Vikas Vishwakarma
>            Assignee: Harshal Jain
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0, 1.5.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-19024-master.v10.patch, 
> HBASE-19024.branch-1.2.001.patch, HBASE-19024.branch-1.2.002.patch, 
> HBASE-19024.branch-1.2.003.patch, HBASE-19024.branch-1.2.004.patch, 
> HBASE-19024.branch-1.2.005.patch, branch-1.branch-1.patch, 
> branch-1.v1.branch-1.patch, master.patch, master.v2.patch, master.v3.patch, 
> master.v5.patch, master.v5.patch, master.v6.patch, master.v9.patch
>
>
> At present we do not have an option to hsync WAL edits to the disk for better 
> durability. In our local tests we see 10-15% latency impact of using hsync 
> instead of hflush which is not very high.  
> We should have a configurable option to hysnc WAL edits instead of just 
> sync/hflush which will call the corresponding API on the hadoop side. 
> Currently HBase handles both SYNC_WAL and FSYNC_WAL as the same calling 
> FSDataOutputStream sync/hflush on the hadoop side. This can be modified to 
> let FSYNC_WAL call hsync on the hadoop side instead of sync/hflush. We can 
> keep the default value to sync as the current behavior and hsync can be 
> enabled based on explicit configuration.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to