[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sean Busbey updated HBASE-20277:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
Feedback from [~mdrob] on HBASE-19158:

{quote}

Classes/Methods moved:
* HBASE-19425 (and subtasks) Put/Delete/Increment/Append
* HBASE-19627 (and subtasks) Cell & Impl
* HBASE-18978 (and subtasks) Async/Table
* HBASE-18805 (and subtasks) Async/Admin
* HBASE-14996 (and subtasks) Lots of misc changes
* HBASE-13197 (and subtasks) Connection
* HBASE-13844 KeyValue -> CellUtil
* Maybe HBASE-19950 is worth calling out? Not really an upgrade issue though, 
but I know the old behavior of SCVF changed in a surprising way for the YARN 
ATS folks, when they were previously relying on what ended up being a bug.

Could be mitigated by having a compatibility report, but would benefit from 
narrative messaging.

Almost definitely need a blanket reminder that some deprecated APIs went away.

{quote}

from @busbey on HBASE-19158

{quote}


bq. * Classes/Methods moved:
bq. * Almost definitely need a blanket reminder that some deprecated APIs went 
away.


My intention was for both of these to be handled by this blurb:

{code}
+[[upgrade2.0.public.api]]
+.Multiple breaking changes to source and binary compatibility for client API
+The Java client API for HBase has a number of changes that break both source 
and binary compatibility for details see the Compatibility Check Report for the 
release you'll be upgrading to.
+
+<!-- This would be a good place to link to an appendix on migrating 
applications -->
+
{code}

I figure once we get an appendix that provides guidance on migrating an 
application from 1.x to 2.x we can also link to it.
{quote}

Get an appendix in place and then update the upgrade section as needed to draw 
attention to it.

  was:
Feedback from [~mdrob] on HBASE-19158:

{quote}

Classes/Methods moved:
* HBASE-19425 (and subtasks) Put/Delete/Increment/Append
* HBASE-19627 (and subtasks) Cell & Impl
* HBASE-18978 (and subtasks) Async/Table
* HBASE-18805 (and subtasks) Async/Admin
* HBASE-14996 (and subtasks) Lots of misc changes
* HBASE-13197 (and subtasks) Connection
* HBASE-13844 KeyValue -> CellUtil
* Maybe HBASE-19950 is worth calling out? Not really an upgrade issue though, 
but I know the old behavior of SCVF changed in a surprising way for the YARN 
ATS folks, when they were previously relying on what ended up being a bug.

Could be mitigated by having a compatibility report, but would benefit from 
narrative messaging.

Almost definitely need a blanket reminder that some deprecated APIs went away.

{quote}

from @busbey on HBASE-19158

{quote}
{quote}
* Classes/Methods moved:
* Almost definitely need a blanket reminder that some deprecated APIs went away.
{quote}

My intention was for both of these to be handled by this blurb:

{quote}
+[[upgrade2.0.public.api]]
+.Multiple breaking changes to source and binary compatibility for client API
+The Java client API for HBase has a number of changes that break both source 
and binary compatibility for details see the Compatibility Check Report for the 
release you'll be upgrading to.
+
+<!-- This would be a good place to link to an appendix on migrating 
applications -->
+
{quote}

I figure once we get an appendix that provides guidance on migrating an 
application from 1.x to 2.x we can also link to it.
{quote}

Get an appendix in place and then update the upgrade section as needed to draw 
attention to it.


> [DOC] appendix with guidance on updating applications for HBase 2
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-20277
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20277
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Client, documentation
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Priority: Major
>
> Feedback from [~mdrob] on HBASE-19158:
> {quote}
> Classes/Methods moved:
> * HBASE-19425 (and subtasks) Put/Delete/Increment/Append
> * HBASE-19627 (and subtasks) Cell & Impl
> * HBASE-18978 (and subtasks) Async/Table
> * HBASE-18805 (and subtasks) Async/Admin
> * HBASE-14996 (and subtasks) Lots of misc changes
> * HBASE-13197 (and subtasks) Connection
> * HBASE-13844 KeyValue -> CellUtil
> * Maybe HBASE-19950 is worth calling out? Not really an upgrade issue though, 
> but I know the old behavior of SCVF changed in a surprising way for the YARN 
> ATS folks, when they were previously relying on what ended up being a bug.
> Could be mitigated by having a compatibility report, but would benefit from 
> narrative messaging.
> Almost definitely need a blanket reminder that some deprecated APIs went away.
> {quote}
> from @busbey on HBASE-19158
> {quote}
> bq. * Classes/Methods moved:
> bq. * Almost definitely need a blanket reminder that some deprecated APIs 
> went away.
> My intention was for both of these to be handled by this blurb:
> {code}
> +[[upgrade2.0.public.api]]
> +.Multiple breaking changes to source and binary compatibility for client API
> +The Java client API for HBase has a number of changes that break both source 
> and binary compatibility for details see the Compatibility Check Report for 
> the release you'll be upgrading to.
> +
> +<!-- This would be a good place to link to an appendix on migrating 
> applications -->
> +
> {code}
> I figure once we get an appendix that provides guidance on migrating an 
> application from 1.x to 2.x we can also link to it.
> {quote}
> Get an appendix in place and then update the upgrade section as needed to 
> draw attention to it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to