[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16416641#comment-16416641
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20167:
--------------------------------
Results for branch HBASE-19064
[build #77 on
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-19064/77/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-19064/77//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-19064/77//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-19064/77//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
> Optimize the implementation of ReplicationSourceWALReader
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20167
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20167
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Replication
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20167-v1.patch, HBASE-20167-v2.patch,
> HBASE-20167.patch
>
>
> After HBASE-20148, serial replication will be an option for peer. Since an
> instance of ReplicationSourceWALReader can only belongs to one peer, we do
> not need to add the so many 'if' in the implementation of readWALEntries to
> check whether we should consider serial replication. We can just make a sub
> class or something similiar for serial replication to make the code clean.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
