[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13209870#comment-13209870
]
Kannan Muthukkaruppan commented on HBASE-3584:
----------------------------------------------
Actually, RowMutations (in plural) doesn't sound good in documentation. For
example saying,
"A RowMutations which contains a Put & Delete.."
is grammatically broken and either of the following sounds much better:
"A RowOperation which contains a Put & Delete.."
or
"A AtomicRowMutation which contains a Put & Delete.."
So, can we go use RowOperation or AtomicRowMutation instead?
> Allow atomic put/delete in one call
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3584
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3584
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: client, coprocessors, regionserver
> Reporter: ryan rawson
> Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
> Fix For: 0.94.0
>
> Attachments: 3584-final.txt, 3584-v1.txt, 3584-v3.txt
>
>
> Right now we have the following calls:
> put(Put)
> delete(Delete)
> increment(Increments)
> But we cannot combine all of the above in a single call, complete with a
> single row lock. It would be nice to do that.
> It would also allow us to do a CAS where we could do a put/increment if the
> check succeeded.
> -----
> Amendment:
> Since Increment does not currently support MVCC it cannot be included in an
> atomic operation.
> So this for Put and Delete only.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
