[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16455754#comment-16455754
]
Thiriguna Bharat Rao commented on HBASE-20369:
----------------------------------------------
[~busbey] First of all, many thanks for reviewing the content and providing
feedback.
Please find my responses to the feedback:
# Rolling upgrade: When I created the first draft, there was no information
available about the rolling upgrade in the hbase reference guide. I referenced
the beta 1 discussion thread and the raw content. There was mention of:
"Minimum of 1.2 for rolling upgrade to 2.0. No downtime. Works for
secure cluster (delegation tokens)."
So, I assumed that it's possible from 1.2.
2. Yes, I meant changes to InterfaceAudience.Private classes.
My follow up query is, should we add a note that these classes are
internal to the project.
Also, in hindsight, I think, we can remove the general information heading and
straightaway address the changes that they the users need to be aware of for
reference. Please let me know your views.
Appreciate your support and time.
Best,
Triguna
> Document incompatibilities between HBase 1.1.2 and HBase 2.0
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20369
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20369
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Thiriguna Bharat Rao
> Assignee: Thiriguna Bharat Rao
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: patch
> Attachments: HBASE-20369.patch, HBASE-20369_v1.patch,
> HBASE-20369_v2.patch, HBASE-20369_v3.patch, HBASE-20369_v4.patch, book.adoc
>
>
> Hi,
> I compiled a draft document for the HBase incompatibilities from the raw
> source content that was available in HBase Beta 1 site. Can someone please
> review and provide a feedback or share your comments on this document?
> Appreciate your support and time.
>
> Best Regards,
> Triguna
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
