[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16476417#comment-16476417
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20447:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-1.4
[build #321 on
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/321/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/321//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/321//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/321//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
> Only fail cacheBlock if block collisions aren't related to next block metadata
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20447
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20447
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: BlockCache, BucketCache
> Affects Versions: 1.4.3, 2.0.0
> Reporter: Zach York
> Assignee: Zach York
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0, 1.5.0, 1.4.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20447.branch-1.001.patch,
> HBASE-20447.branch-1.002.patch, HBASE-20447.branch-1.003.patch,
> HBASE-20447.branch-1.004.patch, HBASE-20447.branch-1.005.patch,
> HBASE-20447.branch-1.006.patch, HBASE-20447.master.001.patch,
> HBASE-20447.master.002.patch, HBASE-20447.master.003.patch,
> HBASE-20447.master.004.patch
>
>
> This is the issue I was originally having here:
> [http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-dev/201802.mbox/%3CCAN+qs_Pav=md_aoj4xji+kcnetubg2xou2ntxv1g6m8-5vn...@mail.gmail.com%3E]
>
> When we pread, we don't force the read to read all of the next block header.
> However, when we get into a race condition where two opener threads try to
> cache the same block and one thread read all of the next block header and the
> other one didn't, it will fail the open process. This is especially important
> in a splitting case where it will potentially fail the split process.
> Instead, in the caches, we should only fail if the required blocks are
> different.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
