[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16510797#comment-16510797
]
maoling commented on HBASE-20623:
---------------------------------
[~chia7712] What new api style do you want? just like this?
{code:java}
CellBuilder cellbuild = null;
for (int i = 0; i < SOME_NUMBER; i++) {
final byte[] row = Bytes.toBytes(i);
final Put operation = new Put(row);
//implements a CellBuilder got from a Put having "row" should have
assigned the "row" and "Type.Put".
cellbuild =
CellBuilderFactory.create(CellBuilderType.SHALLOW_COPY).getCellBuilder(Operation
operation);
cellbuild.setFamily(FAMILY_BYTES);
put.add(cellbuild.build());
table.put(operation);
}
{code}
> Introduce the helper method "getCellBuilder()" to Mutation
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20623
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20623
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: API
> Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Assignee: maoling
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0
>
>
> see
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d05bfaa0134502a47f6e1aca56cb0b096d4dd32ddefbbdf28db4952a@%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E]
> for more details.
> {code:java}
> How about a "getCellBuilder" or "getCellBuilderFactory" method for
> Mutation implementations that gives you a CellBuilder instance that
> already has relevant parts set? Like for a Put instance it should be
> able to already have the Type and Row set.{code}
> mentioned a day or so ago by [~busbey]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
