[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518851#comment-16518851
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20706:
--------------------------------
Results for branch master
[build #371 on
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/371/]: (x)
*{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/371//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/371//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/371//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> [hack] Don't add known not-OPEN regions in reopen phase of MTP
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20706
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20706
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: amv2
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0, 2.0.2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20706.001.branch-2.0.patch,
> HBASE-20706.002.branch-2.0.patch, HBASE-20706.003.branch-2.0.patch
>
>
> Shake-down of ModifyTableProcedure, talked this one out with Stack – "proper"
> fix is likely pending in HBASE-20682. Using MoveRegionProcedure is likely the
> wrong construct, we would want something specific to reopen (e.g. a
> ReopenProcedure).
> However, we're in a really bad state right now. If there are non-open regions
> for a table which has a modify submitted against it, the entire system locks
> up in a fast-spin while holding the table's lock. This fills up HDFS with PV2
> wals, and prevents you from doing anything in the hbase shell to try to fix
> those unassigned regions. You'll see spam in the master log like:
> {noformat}
> 2018-06-07 03:21:29,448 WARN [PEWorker-1] procedure.ModifyTableProcedure:
> Retriable error trying to modify table=METRIC_RECORD_HOURLY_UUID (in
> state=MODIFY_TABLE_REOPEN_ALL_REGIONS)
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.DoNotRetryRegionException:
> a3dc333606d38aeb6e2ab4b94233cfbc is not OPEN
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.procedure.AbstractStateMachineTableProcedure.checkOnline(AbstractStateMachineTableProcedure.java:193)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.MoveRegionProcedure.<init>(MoveRegionProcedure.java:67)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.AssignmentManager.createMoveRegionProcedure(AssignmentManager.java:767)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.AssignmentManager.createReopenProcedures(AssignmentManager.java:705)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.procedure.ModifyTableProcedure.executeFromState(ModifyTableProcedure.java:128)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.procedure.ModifyTableProcedure.executeFromState(ModifyTableProcedure.java:50)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.StateMachineProcedure.execute(StateMachineProcedure.java:184)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.Procedure.doExecute(Procedure.java:850)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.ProcedureExecutor.execProcedure(ProcedureExecutor.java:1472)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.ProcedureExecutor.executeProcedure(ProcedureExecutor.java:1240)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.ProcedureExecutor.access$800(ProcedureExecutor.java:75)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.ProcedureExecutor$WorkerThread.run(ProcedureExecutor.java:1760)
> {noformat}
> We unstuck out internal test cluster giving the following change on top of
> Sergey's HBASE-20657. When choosing the regions to reopen, if we filter out a
> table's regions to only be those which are currently OPEN. There may be some
> transient failures here as well, but a subsequent retry of the reopen step
> should filter out that change.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
