[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13215428#comment-13215428
]
Jai Kumar Singh commented on HBASE-5166:
----------------------------------------
@stack,ted: any idea why its failing these tests ?
> MultiThreaded Table Mapper analogous to MultiThreaded Mapper in hadoop
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5166
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5166
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jai Kumar Singh
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: multithreaded, tablemapper
> Attachments: 0001-Added-MultithreadedTableMapper-HBASE-5166.patch,
> 0003-Added-MultithreadedTableMapper-HBASE-5166.patch,
> 0005-HBASE-5166-Added-MultithreadedTableMapper.patch,
> 0006-HBASE-5166-Added-MultithreadedTableMapper.patch,
> 0008-HBASE-5166-Added-MultithreadedTableMapper.patch, 5166-v9.txt
>
> Original Estimate: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.5h
>
> There is no MultiThreadedTableMapper in hbase currently just like we have a
> MultiThreadedMapper in Hadoop for IO Bound Jobs.
> UseCase, webcrawler: take input (urls) from a hbase table and put the content
> (urls, content) back into hbase.
> Running these kind of hbase mapreduce job with normal table mapper is quite
> slow as we are not utilizing CPU fully (N/W IO Bound).
> Moreover, I want to know whether It would be a good/bad idea to use HBase for
> these kind of usecases ?.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
