[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16554352#comment-16554352
 ] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-9888:
-------------------------------

{code}
+   * @return create time for a replication peer
{code}
create time -> creation time
{code}
+  private long createTime = Long.MIN_VALUE;
{code}
createTime -> creationTime
{code}
+  void initCreateTime(final ZooKeeperWatcher zookeeper, String peerNode) 
throws KeeperException {
{code}
initCreateTime -> initCreationTime

In TestReplicationEndpoint.java, the new flag is set to false. Is there any 
test failing in this class ?

For master branch, can similar solution be applied ?

> HBase replicates edits written before the replication peer is created
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9888
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9888
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Dave Latham
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HBASE-9888.branch-1.001.patch
>
>
> When creating a new replication peer the ReplicationSourceManager enqueues 
> the currently open HLog to the ReplicationSource to ship to the destination 
> cluster.  The ReplicationSource starts at the beginning of the HLog and ships 
> over any pre-existing writes.
> A workaround is to roll all the HLogs before enabling replication.
> A little background for how it affected us - we were migrating one cluster in 
> a master-master pair.  I.e. transitioning from A <\-> B to B <-> C.  After 
> shutting down writes from A -> B we enabled writes from C -> B.  However, 
> this replicated some earlier writes that were in C's HLogs that had 
> originated in A.  Since we were running a version of HBase before HBASE-7709 
> those writes then got caught in a infinite replication cycle and bringing 
> down region servers OOM because of HBASE-9865.
> However, in general, if one wants to manage what data gets replicated, one 
> wouldn't expect that potentially very old writes would be included when 
> setting up a new replication link.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to