[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13217311#comment-13217311
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-5399:
------------------------------

bq... If I don't want to do that, I need to add the method in the object 
returned by getProxy. You think it makes sense?

How would that work (I've wanted to add a method to the returned proxy in the 
past).  Would you have returned proxy implement another Interface (That sounds 
hard).  Make the returned Interface implement Closeable?  Or, even, whats wrong 
w/ the close going remote?   Maybe there are resources master-side to clean up 
(if not now, maybe one day?... though yeah, if client doesn't have to make the 
RPC, lets not bother if possible).   Sounds like something to try and figure -- 
if possible (Of course I've no ideas?)

BTW, what you have above for conenction w/ try/finally looks ideal


                
> Cut the link between the client and the zookeeper ensemble
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5399
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.0
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: nkeywal
>            Assignee: nkeywal
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 5399_inprogress.patch, 5399_inprogress.v3.patch, 
> 5399_inprogress.v9.patch
>
>
> The link is often considered as an issue, for various reasons. One of them 
> being that there is a limit on the number of connection that ZK can manage. 
> Stack was suggesting as well to remove the link to master from HConnection.
> There are choices to be made considering the existing API (that we don't want 
> to break).
> The first patches I will submit on hadoop-qa should not be committed: they 
> are here to show the progress on the direction taken.
> ZooKeeper is used for:
> - public getter, to let the client do whatever he wants, and close ZooKeeper 
> when closing the connection => we have to deprecate this but keep it.
> - read get master address to create a master => now done with a temporary 
> zookeeper connection
> - read root location => now done with a temporary zookeeper connection, but 
> questionable. Used in public function "locateRegion". To be reworked.
> - read cluster id => now done once with a temporary zookeeper connection.
> - check if base done is available => now done once with a zookeeper 
> connection given as a parameter
> - isTableDisabled/isTableAvailable => public functions, now done with a 
> temporary zookeeper connection.
>      - Called internally from HBaseAdmin and HTable
> - getCurrentNrHRS(): public function to get the number of region servers and 
> create a pool of thread => now done with a temporary zookeeper connection
> -
> Master is used for:
> - getMaster public getter, as for ZooKeeper => we have to deprecate this but 
> keep it.
> - isMasterRunning(): public function, used internally by HMerge & HBaseAdmin
> - getHTableDescriptor*: public functions offering access to the master.  => 
> we could make them using a temporary master connection as well.
> Main points are:
> - hbase class for ZooKeeper; ZooKeeperWatcher is really designed for a 
> strongly coupled architecture ;-). This can be changed, but requires a lot of 
> modifications in these classes (likely adding a class in the middle of the 
> hierarchy, something like that). Anyway, non connected client will always be 
> really slower, because it's a tcp connection, and establishing a tcp 
> connection is slow.
> - having a link between ZK and all the client seems to make sense for some 
> Use Cases. However, it won't scale if a TCP connection is required for every 
> client
> - if we move the table descriptor part away from the client, we need to find 
> a new place for it.
> - we will have the same issue if HBaseAdmin (for both ZK & Master), may be we 
> can put a timeout on the connection. That would make the whole system less 
> deterministic however.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to