[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16584586#comment-16584586
 ] 

Mingliang Liu commented on HBASE-21071:
---------------------------------------

Thanks [[email protected]] and [~stack] for positive feedback.

Yes, the existing structure is not very well organized as we have multiple 
{{MiniHBaseCluster}} constructors accepting different combination of arguments, 
13 {{startMiniCluster()}} methods, and 3 {{startMiniHBaseCluster()}}; plus 
{{startMiniCluster()}} ultimately calls {{startMiniHBaseCluster()}} after 
building {{MiniDFSCluster}} and {{MiniZKCluster}}.

{quote}
Does this mean the options should be MiniHBaseClusterOptions and we should 
rename this start method to be startMiniHBaseCluster.
{quote}
My previous idea was to have both DFS cluster options ({{numDataNodes}} and 
{{dataNodeHosts}}) and HBase cluster options as most tests create them together 
via {{startMiniCluster()}}. I also see usages where only DFSCluster was created 
so I think HBase cluster (option) builder also makes sense here.

{quote}
Would a MiniHBaseClusterBuilder make sense returning a MiniHBaseCluster 
instance on which you called start.
{quote}
I like this idea. Let me provide an early patch to show how the structure can 
be clearer. I will work on {{master}} branch first as I don't worry about 
pruning old stuff.


> HBaseTestingUtility::startMiniCluster() to use builder pattern
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21071
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21071
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: test
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Mingliang Liu
>            Assignee: Mingliang Liu
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently there are 13 {{startMiniCluster()}} methods to set up a mini 
> cluster. I'm not surprised if we have a few more in future. It's good to 
> support different combination of optional parameters. We have to pick up one 
> of them carefully while still wondering the default values of other 
> parameters; if we add a new option, we may bring more new methods.
> One solution is to use builder pattern: create a class {{MiniClusterOptions}} 
> along with a static class {{MiniClusterOptionsBuilder}}, create a new method  
> {{startMiniCluster(MiniClusterOptions)}}. In {{master}} we delete the old 13 
> methods while in branch-2, we deprecate the old 13 methods.
> Thoughts?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to