[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16604524#comment-16604524
]
Josh Elser commented on HBASE-21091:
------------------------------------
{quote}It is a sample illustration, i get it, please ignore my comment above.
{quote}
It's a good question! :)
I split out the preexisting hadoop-3.0.x and hadoop-3.1.x rows into:
hadoop-3.0.[0-2], hadoop-3.0.3+, hadoop-3.1.0, and hadoop-3.1.1+ to capture our
known-good dependency on Hadoop-3.0.3+ and Hadoop-3.1.1+.
> Update Hadoop compatibility table
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-21091
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21091
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-20264.001.patch, hbase-20264-html.png
>
>
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7016d322a07e96dccdb071041c37238e43d3df4f93e9515d52ccfafc@%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E]
> covers some discussion around our Hadoop Version Compatibility table.
>
> A "leading" suggestion to make this more clear is to use a green/yellow/red
> (traffic-signal) style marking, instead of using specifics words/phrases (as
> they're often dependent on the interpretation of the reader).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
