[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16651156#comment-16651156
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-21290:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-2.0
[build #956 on
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/956/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/956//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/956//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/956//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
> No need to instantiate BlockCache for master which not carry table
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-21290
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21290
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Guanghao Zhang
> Assignee: Guanghao Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.1.1, 2.0.3
>
> Attachments: HBASE-21290.master.001.patch,
> HBASE-21290.master.002.patch, HBASE-21290.master.003.patch,
> HBASE-21290.master.004.patch
>
>
> In our production clusters, we use different jvm config for
> master/regionserver but use same hbase-site.xml for master/regionserver. And
> master has a small heap/offheap config. So the regionserver's
> hbase.bucketcache.size is not suitable for master. I thought we don't need to
> instantiate BlockCache for master which not carry table.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
