[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16654628#comment-16654628
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-21291:
-------------------------------

So, if override is set, make the waitTime some nominal amount -- say 10ms? This 
way we wait on the lock for a little while but will proceed after 10ms even if 
we don't get the lock?

So, doing bypass on an AssignProcedure, I see that it reports this:

2424243         2341740         RUNNABLE(Bypass)

... but it still has exclusive lock held.

{code}
REGION: 2651cb48574979f2dccc64e3c02ad5e0

Lock type: EXCLUSIVE

Owner procedure: { ID => '2424243', PARENT_ID => '2341740', STATE => 
'RUNNABLE', OWNER => 'hbase', TYPE => 'AssignProcedure 
table=IntegrationTestBigLinkedList_20180815104044, 
region=2651cb48574979f2dccc64e3c02ad5e0', START_TIME => 'Wed Oct 17 12:41:37 
PDT 2018', LAST_UPDATE => 'Wed Oct 17 15:29:53 PDT 2018', PARAMETERS => [ { 
transitionState => 'REGION_TRANSITION_DISPATCH', regionInfo => { regionId => 
'1534357375831', tableName => { namespace => 'ZGVmYXVsdA==', qualifier => 
'SW50ZWdyYXRpb25UZXN0QmlnTGlua2VkTGlzdF8yMDE4MDgxNTEwNDA0NA==' }, startKey => 
'Np+lMnWysqQ=', endKey => 'NqGeiPHP0F8=', offline => 'false', split => 'false', 
replicaId => '0' } } ] }
{code}

Maybe the lock is held because we are not running running this Procedure...  PE 
is jammed up?

> Add a test for bypassing stuck state-machine procedures
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21291
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21291
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Jingyun Tian
>            Assignee: Jingyun Tian
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-21291.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-21291.master.002.patch, HBASE-21291.master.003.patch, 
> HBASE-21291.master.004.patch, HBASE-21291.master.005.patch
>
>
> {code}
>       if (!procedure.isFailed()) {
>         if (subprocs != null) {
>           if (subprocs.length == 1 && subprocs[0] == procedure) {
>             // Procedure returned itself. Quick-shortcut for a state 
> machine-like procedure;
>             // i.e. we go around this loop again rather than go back out on 
> the scheduler queue.
>             subprocs = null;
>             reExecute = true;
>             LOG.trace("Short-circuit to next step on pid={}", 
> procedure.getProcId());
>           } else {
>             // Yield the current procedure, and make the subprocedure runnable
>             // subprocs may come back 'null'.
>             subprocs = initializeChildren(procStack, procedure, subprocs);
>             LOG.info("Initialized subprocedures=" +
>               (subprocs == null? null:
>                 Stream.of(subprocs).map(e -> "{" + e.toString() + "}").
>                 collect(Collectors.toList()).toString()));
>           }
>         } else if (procedure.getState() == ProcedureState.WAITING_TIMEOUT) {
>           LOG.debug("Added to timeoutExecutor {}", procedure);
>           timeoutExecutor.add(procedure);
>         } else if (!suspended) {
>           // No subtask, so we are done
>           procedure.setState(ProcedureState.SUCCESS);
>         }
>       }
> {code}
> Currently implementation of ProcedureExecutor will set the reExcecute to true 
> for state machine like procedure. Then if this procedure is stuck at one 
> certain state, it will loop forever.
> {code}
>           IdLock.Entry lockEntry = 
> procExecutionLock.getLockEntry(proc.getProcId());
>           try {
>             executeProcedure(proc);
>           } catch (AssertionError e) {
>             LOG.info("ASSERT pid=" + proc.getProcId(), e);
>             throw e;
>           } finally {
>             procExecutionLock.releaseLockEntry(lockEntry);
> {code}
> Since procedure will get the IdLock and release it after execution done, 
> state machine procedure will never release IdLock until it is finished.
> Then bypassProcedure doesn't work because is will try to grab the IdLock at 
> first.
> {code}
>     IdLock.Entry lockEntry = 
> procExecutionLock.tryLockEntry(procedure.getProcId(), lockWait);
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to