[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16661893#comment-16661893
 ] 

Allan Yang commented on HBASE-21365:
------------------------------------

I suggest to add a release note or add a few lines on the help doc, and only 
commit to master branch(which we don't need to consider compatibility). We have 
added similar features in our internal branch. When this feature come online, 
some of the customers already using skip wal while replication on complained 
that they can't write to HBase. If some company update their HBase to a version 
w/ this patch without knowing this behave, it may cause their online system 
fail.

> Throw exception when user put data with skip wal to a table which may be 
> replicated
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21365
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21365
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Guanghao Zhang
>            Assignee: Guanghao Zhang
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-21365.master.001.patch
>
>
> A real problem in our production cluster. A user point that his table's data 
> can't be replicate to the peer cluster. Then we start to debug the reason. We 
> checked the replication scope, checked the replication wal entry filter, and 
> check the namespace,tablecfs config. But didn't found any problem. We enabled 
> the RS's debug log to find the reason. Finally, we found use use put with 
> skip wal to write data. But it taked a long time... Our replication use wal 
> to replicate data. So the data can't be replicated to peer cluster. I thought 
> throw a exception may be better for user if the table's replication scope is 
> not 0. (as 0 means not replicated).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to