[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16686371#comment-16686371
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-21468:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2.0
        [build #1083 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/1083/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/1083//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/1083//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.0/1083//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> separate workers for meta table is not working
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21468
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21468
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.1, 2.0.2
>            Reporter: Allan Yang
>            Assignee: Allan Yang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.3, 2.1.2
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-21468.branch-2.0.001.patch
>
>
> This is an addendum for HBASE-21423, since HBASE-21423 is already closed, the 
> QA won't be triggered.
> It is my mistake that the separate workers for meta table is not working, 
> since when polling from queue, the onlyUrgent flag is not passed in.
> And for some UT that only require one worker thread, urgent workers should 
> set to 0 to ensure there is one worker at time.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to