[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16695094#comment-16695094
]
David Manning commented on HBASE-21146:
---------------------------------------
[~stack] I applied HBASE-21145 patch (branch-2.1) and fixed it up, and
validated tests pass locally. Hope it works for you!
> (2.0) Add ability for HBase Canary to ignore a configurable number of
> ZooKeeper down nodes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-21146
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21146
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: canary, Zookeeper
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 3.0.0, 2.0.0
> Reporter: David Manning
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.1.2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-21126.branch-1.001.patch,
> HBASE-21126.master.001.patch, HBASE-21126.master.002.patch,
> HBASE-21126.master.003.patch, HBASE-21146.branch-2.0.001.patch,
> zookeeperCanaryLocalTestValidation.txt
>
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> When running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.tool.Canary with args -zookeeper
> -treatFailureAsError, the Canary will try to get a znode from each ZooKeeper
> server in the ensemble. If any server is unavailable or unresponsive, the
> canary will exit with a failure code.
> If we use the Canary to gauge server health, and alert accordingly, this can
> be too strict. For example, in a 5-node ZooKeeper cluster, having one node
> down is safe and expected in rolling upgrades/patches.
> This is a request to allow the Canary to take another parameter
> {code:java}
> -permittedZookeeperFailures <N>{code}
> If N=1, in the 5-node ZooKeeper ensemble example, then the Canary will still
> pass if 4 ZooKeeper nodes are reachable, but fail if 3 or fewer are reachable.
> (This is my first Jira posting... sorry if I messed anything up.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
