[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13226755#comment-13226755
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-5542:
--------------------------------------
If you like I can take a shot at refactoring doMiniBatchPut with the new
approach once you're done with mutateRowsWithLocks and processRowsWithLocks.
Of course if you prefer to do the whole thing that's fine too :)
> Unify HRegion.mutateRowsWithLocks() and HRegion.processRow()
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5542
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Scott Chen
> Assignee: Scott Chen
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-5542.D2217.1.patch, HBASE-5542.D2217.2.patch,
> HBASE-5542.D2217.3.patch
>
>
> mutateRowsWithLocks() does atomic mutations on multiple rows.
> processRow() does atomic read-modify-writes on a single row.
> It will be useful to generalize both and have a
> processRowsWithLocks() that does atomic read-modify-writes on multiple rows.
> This also helps reduce some redundancy in the codes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
