[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16741648#comment-16741648
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-21537:
-------------------------------

bq. The final goal is to completely remove the getAdmin method from 
ClusterConnection, as it exposes the blocking protobuf interface, which will be 
a pain when we reimplement sync client based on the async client.

Oh. I see now. Connection#getAdmin returns Admin Interface. 
ClusterConnection#getAdmin takes a ServerName and returns the sync impl of pb 
Service.

Looking at patch again....

Regards AsyncRegionServerAdmin admin = connection.getRegionServerAdmin(server);

... perhaps s/AsyncRegionServerAdmin/RegionServerAdmin/ and have RSAdmin be 
Async only? There'll be the FutureUtils for those who want to do sync? The 
Async prefix seems a mouthful.


bq. And no need to change the hbck project, it is hbck1 here, which will be 
removed in the future I think.

We might want it in hbck2... but can wait. Or I think the shell does this? 
Would have to check.

I'm +1 on commit.


> Rewrite ServerManager.closeRegionSilentlyAndWait to use AsyncClusterConnection
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21537
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21537
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HBASE-21537-HBASE-21512.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to