[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773422#comment-16773422
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21796:
-----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
22s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue} 0m
1s{color} | {color:blue} Findbugs executables are not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-1 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
12s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
51s{color} | {color:green} branch-1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
1s{color} | {color:green} branch-1 passed with JDK v1.8.0_202 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s{color} | {color:green} branch-1 passed with JDK v1.7.0_211 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
55s{color} | {color:green} branch-1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 2m
52s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} branch-1 passed with JDK v1.8.0_202 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green} branch-1 passed with JDK v1.7.0_211 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
12s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
36s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_202 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_211 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 1m
21s{color} | {color:red} hbase-server: The patch generated 1 new + 15 unchanged
- 0 fixed = 16 total (was 15) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 2m
42s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
1m 37s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop
2.7.4. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_202 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_211 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
26s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}115m 53s{color}
| {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 1m
19s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}142m 59s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hbase.client.TestReplicasClient |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:61288f8 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-21796 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12959486/HBASE-21796.003.branch-1.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit findbugs
shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile |
| uname | Linux 9e5dae1d5b32 4.4.0-139-generic #165~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct
31 10:55:11 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
|
| git revision | branch-1 / 47e42da |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.0.5 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_211 |
| Multi-JDK versions | /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:1.8.0_202
/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_211 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16057/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-hbase-server.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16057/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16057/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 4027 (vs. ulimit of 10000) |
| modules | C: hbase-client hbase-server U: . |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16057/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> RecoverableZooKeeper indefinitely retries a client stuck in AUTH_FAILED
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-21796
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21796
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Zookeeper
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.1
>
> Attachments: HBASE-21796.001.branch-1.patch,
> HBASE-21796.002.branch-1.patch, HBASE-21796.003.branch-1.patch
>
>
> We've observed the following situation inside of a RegionServer which leaves
> an HConnection in a broken state as a result of the ZooKeeper client having
> received an AUTH_FAILED case in the Phoenix secondary indexing code-path. The
> result was that the HConnection used to write the secondary index updates
> failed every time the client re-attempted the write but we had no outward
> signs from the HConnection that there was a problem with that HConnection
> instance.
> ZooKeeper programmer docs tell us that if a ZooKeeper instance goes to the
> {{AUTH_FAILED}} state that we must open a new ZooKeeper instance:
> [https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.13/zookeeperProgrammers.html#ch_zkSessions]
> When a new HConnection (or one without a cached meta location) tries to
> access ZooKeeper to find meta's location or the cluster ID, this spin
> indefinitely because we can never access ZooKeeper because our client is
> broken from the AUTH_FAILED. For the Phoenix use-case (where we're trying to
> use this HConnection within the RS), this breaks things pretty fast.
> The circumstances that caused us to observe this are not an HBase (or Phoenix
> or ZooKeeper) problem. The AUTH_FAILED exception we see is a result of
> networking issues on a user's system. Despite this, we can make our handling
> of this situation better.
> We already have logic inside of RecoverableZooKeeper to re-create a ZooKeeper
> object when we need one (e.g. session expired/closed). We can extend this
> same logic to also re-create the ZK client object if we observe an
> AUTH_FAILED state.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
