[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16776338#comment-16776338
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-21945:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2.2
        [build #64 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/64/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/64//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/64//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/64//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(x) {color:red}-1 client integration test{color}
-- Something went wrong with this stage, [check relevant console 
output|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/64//console].


> Maintain the original order when sending batch request
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21945
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21945
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: asyncclient, Client
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0.
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-21945.patch, HBASE-21945.patch, HBASE-21945.patch
>
>
> Find this when implementing HBASE-21717. In some UT we put several good 
> requests and bad requests together, and expect only the bad ones to fail. 
> This usually depends on the grouping at rs side, if we group the good one and 
> the bad one together as a batch, it will fail them all. So usually in test we 
> will insert an increment or append in the middle to break them into two 
> groups when executing at RS side.
> So if we do not maintain the order, at the rs side, the increment or append 
> may comes first or last, then the good ones and bad ones will be grouped and 
> cause all of them to fail.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to