[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16789752#comment-16789752
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-22027:
-----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
22s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
22s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 
48s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  2m 
31s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  1m 
36s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  4m 
 5s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded 
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
13s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
51s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
16s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 
53s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  2m 
32s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  2m 
32s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red}  0m 
30s{color} | {color:red} hbase-client: The patch generated 4 new + 0 unchanged 
- 0 fixed = 4 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red}  1m  
3s{color} | {color:red} hbase-server: The patch generated 2 new + 2 unchanged - 
3 fixed = 4 total (was 5) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch has 3 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git 
apply --whitespace=fix <<patch_file>>. Refer https://git-scm.com/docs/git-apply 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  4m 
 9s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded 
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}  
8m  9s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.7.4 
or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  3m 
23s{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}265m  0s{color} 
| {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
52s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}311m 37s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hbase.client.TestSnapshotTemporaryDirectoryWithRegionReplicas |
|   | hadoop.hbase.replication.TestReplicationDisableInactivePeer |
|   | hadoop.hbase.client.TestSnapshotDFSTemporaryDirectory |
|   | hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransactionOnCluster |
|   | hadoop.hbase.client.TestAdmin1 |
|   | hadoop.hbase.client.TestFromClientSide |
|   | hadoop.hbase.client.TestFromClientSideWithCoprocessor |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:b002b0b |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-22027 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12961957/0001-HBase-22027-Split-non-MR-related-parts-of-TokenUtil-.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  
shadedjars  hadoopcheck  hbaseanti  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux 135e4e26aead 4.4.0-138-generic #164-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 2 
17:16:02 UTC 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
 |
| git revision | master / 8a2ee8339a |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.5.4 
(1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-17T18:33:14Z) |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_181 |
| findbugs | v3.1.11 |
| checkstyle | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16330/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-hbase-client.txt
 |
| checkstyle | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16330/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-hbase-server.txt
 |
| whitespace | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16330/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace-eol.txt
 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16330/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16330/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 5465 (vs. ulimit of 10000) |
| modules | C: hbase-client hbase-server U: . |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16330/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Move non-MR parts of TokenUtil into hbase-client
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-22027
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22027
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.3
>            Reporter: Stig Rohde Døssing
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: 
> 0001-HBase-22027-Split-non-MR-related-parts-of-TokenUtil-.patch
>
>
> HBASE-14208 moved TokenUtil from hbase-client to hbase-server.
> I have a project depending on hbase-client 1.4.4, which I'd like to upgrade 
> to 2.1.3. My project uses TokenUtil (specifically obtainAndCacheToken), which 
> is included in hbase-client 1.4.4. At the same time I also have a dependency 
> on Jetty 9.4, which is incompatible with the current version used by Hadoop. 
> I can fix this for hbase-client by using hbase-shaded-client instead, since 
> Jetty is shaded in this jar, but TokenUtil is only present in hbase-server as 
> of 2.0.0. Since there is no hbase-shaded-server, I can't use TokenUtil and 
> Jetty 9.4 at the same time.
> TokenUtil can be split into server-only parts, and a client relevant part 
> that can go back to hbase-client. The TokenUtil in hbase-server can retain 
> the moved methods, and delegate to the util in hbase-client if backward 
> compatibility is a concern.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to