[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233947#comment-13233947
]
Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-5589:
---------------------------------------
And the calling side encodes method names as part of a Writable Invocation so
the interface it seems that order in the interface doesn't matter.
https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/ipc/Invocation.java#L99
This looks to be the case in 0.90 as well.
https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/0.90/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/ipc/HBaseRPC.java#L105
Here's where I need advice. Should bump the protocol version in
trunk/0.96/0.94 (HMasterInterface)? What should I do about the protocol version
number released version to maintain compatibility -- specifically 0.90.x
(HBaseRPCProtocolVersion) or 0.92.x (HMasterInterface)? Keep it the same?
> Add of the offline call to the Master Interface
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5589
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5589
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: hbck
> Affects Versions: 0.90.6, 0.92.0, 0.94.0, 0.96.0
> Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh
> Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh
>
> Hbck from HBASE-5128 requires an offline method on the master to properly
> cleanup state during certain assignment repair operations. This will this
> method will be added to recent and older versions of HBase.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
