[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16832138#comment-16832138
]
HBase QA commented on HBASE-22353:
----------------------------------
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
19s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} test4tests {color} | {color:orange}
0m 0s{color} | {color:orange} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or
modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also
please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
32s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 2m
47s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
28s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
41s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 2m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 2m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m
2s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
33s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
8m 38s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.7.4
or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}221m
44s{color} | {color:green} root in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}260m 22s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce base:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/230/artifact/patchprocess/Dockerfile
|
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-22353 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12967698/HBASE-22353.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit shadedjars
hadoopcheck xml compile |
| uname | Linux 19b5040ecdae 4.4.0-143-generic #169~14.04.2-Ubuntu SMP Wed Feb
13 15:00:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | dev-support/hbase-personality.sh |
| git revision | master / f91768fa6e |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.5.4
(1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-17T18:33:14Z) |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_181 |
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/230/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 5198 (vs. ulimit of 10000) |
| modules | C: . U: . |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/230/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.9.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> update non-shaded netty for Hadoop 2 to a more recent version of 3.6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-22353
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22353
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
> Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22353.patch
>
>
> When using Netty socket for ZK, we got this deadlock.
> Appears to be https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/1181 (or one of similar
> tickets before that).
> We are using Netty 3.6.2 for Hadoop 2, seems like it should be safe to
> upgrade to 3.6.10, assuming it's purely a bugfix release for 3.6.2 and they
> are compatible?
> {noformat}
> Java stack information for the threads listed above:
> ===================================================
> "main-SendThread(...)":
> at org.jboss.netty.handler.ssl.SslHandler.wrap(SslHandler.java:958)
> - waiting to lock <0x00000000c91d8848> (a java.lang.Object)
> - locked <0x00000000cdcc7740> (a java.util.LinkedList)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.handler.ssl.SslHandler.handleDownstream(SslHandler.java:627)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendDownstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:587)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendDownstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:578)
> at org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels.write(Channels.java:704)
> at org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels.write(Channels.java:671)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.AbstractChannel.write(AbstractChannel.java:248)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxnSocketNetty.sendPkt(ClientCnxnSocketNetty.java:268)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxnSocketNetty.doWrite(ClientCnxnSocketNetty.java:291)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxnSocketNetty.doTransport(ClientCnxnSocketNetty.java:249)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:1146)
> "New I/O worker #3":
> at
> org.jboss.netty.handler.ssl.SslHandler.channelClosed(SslHandler.java:1554)
> - waiting to lock <0x00000000cdcc7740> (a java.util.LinkedList)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler.handleUpstream(SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler.java:88)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:560)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:555)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels.fireChannelClosed(Channels.java:468)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.close(AbstractNioWorker.java:351)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.write0(AbstractNioWorker.java:254)
> - locked <0x00000000c91d8770> (a java.lang.Object)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.writeFromUserCode(AbstractNioWorker.java:145)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioClientSocketPipelineSink.eventSunk(NioClientSocketPipelineSink.java:83)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$DefaultChannelHandlerContext.sendDownstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:775)
> at org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels.write(Channels.java:725)
> at org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels.write(Channels.java:686)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.handler.ssl.SslHandler.wrapNonAppData(SslHandler.java:1140)
> at org.jboss.netty.handler.ssl.SslHandler.unwrap(SslHandler.java:1229)
> - locked <0x00000000c91d8848> (a java.lang.Object)
> at org.jboss.netty.handler.ssl.SslHandler.decode(SslHandler.java:910)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.frame.FrameDecoder.callDecode(FrameDecoder.java:425)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.frame.FrameDecoder.messageReceived(FrameDecoder.java:303)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler.handleUpstream(SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler.java:70)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:560)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:555)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels.fireMessageReceived(Channels.java:268)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels.fireMessageReceived(Channels.java:255)
> at org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioWorker.read(NioWorker.java:88)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.process(AbstractNioWorker.java:107)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioSelector.run(AbstractNioSelector.java:312)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.run(AbstractNioWorker.java:88)
> at org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioWorker.run(NioWorker.java:178)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.util.ThreadRenamingRunnable.run(ThreadRenamingRunnable.java:108)
> at
> org.jboss.netty.util.internal.DeadLockProofWorker$1.run(DeadLockProofWorker.java:42)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Found 1 deadlock.
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)