[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16834002#comment-16834002
]
Biju Nair edited comment on HBASE-17028 at 5/6/19 4:55 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
BTW. In the {{TinyLfuBlockCache}} code noticed imports like {{import
com.github.benmanes.caffeine.cache.Cache}} and the code is hosted on the
Authors GitHub repo with Apache license. Wasn't sure whether it is normal?
was (Author: gsbiju):
BTW. In the \{{TinyLfuBlockCache}} code noticed imports like {{
import com.github.benmanes.caffeine.cache.Cache}} and the code is hosted on the
Authors GitHub repo with Apache license. Wasn't sure whether it is normal?
> New 2.0 blockcache (tinylfu) doesn't have inmemory partition, etc Update doc
> and codebase accordingly
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17028
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17028
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: BlockCache
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Biju Nair
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-17028.patch
>
>
> Intent is to make the parent tinylfu blockcache default on in 2.0 replacing
> our old lru blockcache. This issue is about making it clear in doc and code
> how the new blockcache differs from the old (You can put back the old lru
> blockcache with config change).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
