[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16854759#comment-16854759
]
Josh Elser edited comment on HBASE-21415 at 6/3/19 4:16 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
{quote}noticed one problem with one of the comments. One of them is missing a
period:
{quote}
-I'm not seeing this, Phillipe. Are you sure it's missing a period, or maybe
the period is contained in code unchanged by the patch (e.g. on the next line)?-
Nevermind, I see it now.
was (Author: elserj):
{quote}noticed one problem with one of the comments. One of them is missing a
period:
{quote}
I'm not seeing this, Phillipe. Are you sure it's missing a period, or maybe the
period is contained in code unchanged by the patch (e.g. on the next line)?
> Admin#snapshot method documentation is misleading.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-21415
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21415
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Philippe Laflamme
> Assignee: Philippe Laflamme
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: HBASE-21415.002.patch, HBASE-21415.patch,
> HBASE-21415.patch
>
>
> The documentation for the {{Admin#snapshot}} function is misleading in
> regards to snapshot concurrency.
> It currently states the following:
> {quote}Only a single snapshot should be taken at a time for an instance of
> HBase, or results may be undefined (you can tell multiple HBase clusters to
> snapshot at the same time, but only one at a time for a single cluster).
> {quote}
> This seems to indicate that it's dangerous to run snapshots concurrently when
> in fact the HBase master will simply run them sequentially (as per this Slack
> thread [https://apache-hbase.slack.com/archives/C13K8NVAM/p1540994948005900)]
> The suggested fix is to simply remove this entire sentence.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
