[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Viraj Jasani updated HBASE-22460:
---------------------------------
    Release Note: 
Leaked store files can not be removed even after it is invalidated via 
compaction. A reasonable mitigation for a reader reference leak would be a fast 
reopen of the region on the same server.

Configs:

1. hbase.master.regions.recovery.check.interval :

Regions Recovery Chore interval in milliseconds. This chore keeps running at 
this interval to find all regions with configurable max store file ref count 
and reopens them.

2. hbase.regions.recovery.store.file.ref.count :

This config represents Store files Ref Count threshold value considered for 
reopening regions. Any region with store files ref count > this value would be 
eligible for reopening by master. Default value -1 indicates this feature is 
turned off. Only positive integer value should be provided to enable this 
feature.


> Reopen a region if store reader references may have leaked
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-22460
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22460
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 1.5.0, 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Kyle Purtell
>            Assignee: Viraj Jasani
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0
>
>
> We can leak store reader references if a coprocessor or core function somehow 
> opens a scanner, or wraps one, and then does not take care to call close on 
> the scanner or the wrapped instance. A reasonable mitigation for a reader 
> reference leak would be a fast reopen of the region on the same server 
> (initiated by the RS) This will release all resources, like the refcount, 
> leases, etc. The clients should gracefully ride over this like any other 
> region transition. This reopen would be like what is done during schema 
> change application and ideally would reuse the relevant code. If the refcount 
> is over some ridiculous threshold this mitigation could be triggered along 
> with a fat WARN in the logs. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to