[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16962933#comment-16962933
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22460:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-1
        [build #1122 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/1122/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/1122//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/1122//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/1122//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]




(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> Reopen a region if store reader references may have leaked
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-22460
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22460
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 1.5.0, 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Kyle Purtell
>            Assignee: Viraj Jasani
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0
>
>
> We can leak store reader references if a coprocessor or core function somehow 
> opens a scanner, or wraps one, and then does not take care to call close on 
> the scanner or the wrapped instance. A reasonable mitigation for a reader 
> reference leak would be a fast reopen of the region on the same server 
> (initiated by the RS) This will release all resources, like the refcount, 
> leases, etc. The clients should gracefully ride over this like any other 
> region transition. This reopen would be like what is done during schema 
> change application and ideally would reuse the relevant code. If the refcount 
> is over some ridiculous threshold this mitigation could be triggered along 
> with a fat WARN in the logs. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to