[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17054239#comment-17054239
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-18418:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-2
[build #2538 on
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/2538/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/2538//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/2538//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/2538//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/2538//JDK11_Nightly_Build_Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(x) {color:red}-1 client integration test{color}
-- Something went wrong with this stage, [check relevant console
output|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/2538//console].
> Remove apache_hbase_topology from dev-support
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18418
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18418
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Dima Spivak
> Assignee: Dima Spivak
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18418_v1.patch
>
>
> As [~misty] noted on dev@, we still keep a folder containing the Apache HBase
> topology for [clusterdock|https://github.com/clusterdock/framework] in
> dev-support. Since the {{clusterdock}} org on GitHub will likely always have
> a more up-to-date iteration of this code (and since I plan on showing it some
> love there in the next few weeks), we'd probably be better off removing it
> from HBase. Any objections?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
