[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13257241#comment-13257241
]
stack commented on HBASE-5737:
------------------------------
The above is from AM? If so, I'm not sure it a bug. At the time, my sense is
that the balancer ran w/o keeping context. Whats changed is that you seem to
have a LB that is doing this now.
As to whether a bug or improvement, its your call boss.
> Minor Improvements related to balancer.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5737
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: master
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-5737.patch, HBASE-5737_1.patch,
> HBASE-5737_2.patch, HBASE-5737_3.patch
>
>
> Currently in Am.getAssignmentByTable() we use a result map which is currenly
> a hashmap. It could be better if we have a treeMap. Even in
> MetaReader.fullScan we have the treeMap only so that we have the naming order
> maintained. I felt this change could be very useful in cases where we are
> extending the DefaultLoadBalancer.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
