[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13264123#comment-13264123
]
Phabricator commented on HBASE-5867:
------------------------------------
stack has commented on the revision "[jira] [HBASE-5867] [89-fb] Improve
Compaction Throttle Default".
Should we pull this into trunk Nicolas? Would it serve as good default for
out-of-the-box hbase?
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.facebook.net/D2943
BRANCH
(no branch)
> Improve Compaction Throttle Default
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5867
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5867
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg
> Assignee: Nicolas Spiegelberg
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: D2943.1.patch
>
>
> We recently had a production issue where our compactions fell behind because
> our compaction throttle was improperly tuned and accidentally upgraded all
> compactions to the large pool. The default from HBASE-3877 makes 1 bad
> assumption: the default number of flushed files in a compaction. Currently
> the algorithm is:
> throttleSize ~= flushSize * 2
> This assumes that the basic compaction utilizes 3 files and that all 3 files
> are compressed. In this case, "hbase.hstore.compaction.min" == 6 && the
> values were not very compressible. Both conditions should be taken into
> consideration. As a default, it is less damaging for the large thread to be
> slightly higher than it needs to be versus having everything accidentally
> promoted.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
