[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13264994#comment-13264994
 ] 

David S. Wang commented on HBASE-5904:
--------------------------------------

Also, I'm not sure if it matters that 0.90.6 was already cut with this change.  
That means that there is already an incompatible release out there.  I do not 
know what the precedent is here or if there is one.
                
> is_enabled from shell returns differently from pre- and post- HBASE-5155
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5904
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5904
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: zookeeper
>    Affects Versions: 0.90.6
>            Reporter: David S. Wang
>
> If I launch an hbase shell that uses HBase and ZooKeeper without HBASE-5155, 
> against HBase servers with HBASE-5155, then is_enabled for a table always 
> returns false even if the table is considered enabled by the servers from the 
> logs.  If I then do the same thing but with an HBase shell and ZooKeeper with 
> HBASE-5155, then is_enabled returns as expected.
> If I launch an HBase shell that uses HBase and ZooKeeper without HBASE-5155, 
> against HBase servers also without HBASE-5155, then is_enabled works as you'd 
> expect.  But if I then do the same thing but with an HBase shell and 
> ZooKeeper with HBASE-5155, then is_enabled returns false even though the 
> table is considered enabled by the servers from the logs.
> Additionally, if I then try to enable the table from the 
> HBASE-5155-containing shell, it hangs because the ZooKeeper code waits for 
> the ZNode to be updated with "ENABLED" in the data field, but what actually 
> happens is that the ZNode gets deleted since the servers are running without 
> HBASE-5155.
> I think the culprit is that the indication of how a table is considered 
> enabled inside ZooKeeper has changed with HBASE-5155.  Before HBASE-5155, a 
> table was considered enabled if the ZNode for it did not exist.  After 
> HBASE-5155, a table is considered enabled if the ZNode for it exists and has 
> "ENABLED" in its data.  I think the current code is incompatible when running 
> clients and servers where one side has HBASE-5155 and the other side does not.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to