[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17173172#comment-17173172
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-11554:
--------------------------------

Results for branch master
        [build #1806 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1806/]: (x) 
*{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1806/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]






(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1806/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1806/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(x) {color:red}-1 client integration test{color}
--Failed when running client tests on top of Hadoop 2. [see log for 
details|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1806//artifact/output-integration/hadoop-2.log].
 (note that this means we didn't run on Hadoop 3)


> Remove Reusable poolmap Rpc client type.
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11554
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11554
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0, 0.99.0, 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh
>            Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.99.0, 0.98.5
>
>         Attachments: hbase-11554.patch
>
>
> From HBASE-11313 we found that the "Reusable" RpcClient PoolType was 
> impossible to set via configuration and that it was essentially incorrct 
> because it didn't bounded instances.  This patch removes the code.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to