[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17174993#comment-17174993
 ] 

Y. SREENIVASULU REDDY commented on HBASE-24754:
-----------------------------------------------

Verified the Tests with the patch file changes.
 Test parameters are mentioned in this comment
 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24754?focusedCommentId=17170687&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17170687
||Rows processing Time||Branch 1.3 Time (ms)||Branch 2 Time (ms)||%Difference||
|Test 1|12563|8527|47.3|
|Test 2|12545|8840|41.9|
|Test 3|12694|8527|46.5|

And Verified the Overall actual Bulkload job execution, for Branch-2 test with 
patch changes, observed *~42%* improvement.

> Bulk load performance is degraded in HBase 2 
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-24754
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24754
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Performance
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.3
>            Reporter: Ajeet Rai
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: Branc2_withComparator_atKeyValue.patch, 
> Branch1.3_putSortReducer_sampleCode.patch, 
> Branch2_putSortReducer_sampleCode.patch, flamegraph_branch-1_new.svg, 
> flamegraph_branch-2.svg, flamegraph_branch-2_afterpatch.svg
>
>
> in our Test,It is observed that Bulk load performance is degraded in HBase 2 .
>  Test Input: 
> 1: Table with 500 region(300 column family)
> 2:  data =2 TB
> Data Sample
> 18600000001201502051000000068110,18600000001,20150205,5,404,735412,2938,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
> 3: Cluster: 7 node(2 master+5 Region Server)
>  4: No of Container Launched are same in both case
> HBase 2 took 10% more time then HBase 1.3 where test input is same for both 
> cluster
>  
> |Feature|HBase 2.2.3
>  Time(Sec)|HBase 1.3.1
>  Time(Sec)|Diff%|Snappy lib:
>   |
> |BulkLoad|21837|19686.16|-10.93|Snappy lib:
>  HBase 2.2.3: 1.4
>  HBase 1.3.1: 1.4|



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to