[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17200842#comment-17200842
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-25073:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-2.3
[build #56 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.3/56/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.3/56/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.3/56/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.3/56/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.3/56/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> Should not use XXXService.Interface.class.getSimpleName as stub key prefix in
> AsyncConnectionImpl
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-25073
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25073
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Client
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: wangwei
> Priority: Major
> Labels: beginner, trivial
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.3.3, 2.4.0, 2.2.7
>
>
> It will just return "Interface" for all services. This is not a bug for
> AsyncConnectionImpl as we have different maps for ClientService and
> AdminService, but it is still a bit confusing to developers.
> I suggest either we just use empty string and add a comment to say that the
> service name is not important here, or change to use
> XXXService.class.getSimpleName() or XXXService.getDescriptor().getName(), so
> it is less confusing to developers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
