[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13269113#comment-13269113
 ] 

Phabricator commented on HBASE-5494:
------------------------------------

avf has commented on the revision "[jira] [HBASE-5494] [89-fb] Table-level 
locks for schema changing operations.".

  Hi Prakash.

  Thanks for the comments! I'll chat with you on Monday about the potential 
issue around handling connection loss (I was under impression that 
RecoverableZookeeper handles that).

INLINE COMMENTS
  src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/zookeeper/ZooKeeperWrapper.java:1336 
Isn't this handled by RecoverableZooKeeper?
  src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/zookeeper/DistributedLock.java:112 This 
is to verify that we are only releasing a lock that we ourselves acquire, and 
that code doesn't (accidentally) release lock acquired by other 
threads/processes.
  src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/zookeeper/DistributedLock.java:294 Good 
catch, will handle this.

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.facebook.net/D2997

BRANCH
  table_level_ddl_locks

                
> Introduce a zk hosted table-wide read/write lock so only one table operation 
> at a time
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5494
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5494
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: stack
>         Attachments: D2997.3.patch, D2997.4.patch, D2997.5.patch, 
> D2997.6.patch
>
>
> I saw this facility over in the accumulo code base.
> Currently we just try to sort out the mess when splits come in during an 
> online schema edit; somehow we figure we can figure all possible region 
> transition combinations and make the right call.
> We could try and narrow the number of combinations by taking out a zk table 
> lock when doing table operations.
> For example, on split or merge, we could take a read-only lock meaning the 
> table can't be disabled while these are running.
> We could then take a write only lock if we want to ensure the table doesn't 
> change while disabling or enabling process is happening.
> Shouldn't be too hard to add.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to