[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13271893#comment-13271893
]
Matt Corgan commented on HBASE-5976:
------------------------------------
{quote}+1 on hbase-common{quote}
Do you mean start with hbase-common and later pull out hbase-server? (never
introduce hbase-core)
I think those are good names. The reason i thought we should start with
hbase-server was that there would be less code to extract to common and client,
even though the name would be inaccurate for a while.
Looks like the trade-off is: 1) move less code but have a temporarily
inaccurate name, or 2) move more code but keep the name accurate
> Initial module naming
> ---------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5976
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5976
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Jesse Yates
> Original Estimate: 336h
> Remaining Estimate: 336h
>
> There is currently a lot of discussion around the 'right' name for the
> initial module that will host all the code in the primary modularization of
> hbase. The current contenders are:
> * hbase-core
> * hbase-common
> * hbase-server
> * hbase-bucket
> * hbase-hbase
> Let's duke it out and pick the best, while keeping in mind that this module
> will *not* remain the sole module going forward, but is merely the precursor
> Timeline to close this issue is the day before the code gets committed.
> Source:
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/pwi1t1e9K0R/modularizing+trunk&subj=modularizing+trunk
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
