[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13274442#comment-13274442
]
Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5959:
-----------------------------------
I didn't take into account the scale() call at the end of computeMoveCost().
I would think data locality cost should be given higher weight.
Can computeSkewLoadCost() and computeTableSkewLoadCost() be combined ? In
default load balancer, regions are balanced per table.
The way computeTableSkewLoadCost() currently is implemented, one region from a
table on region server can satisfy its goal.
> Add other load balancers
> ------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5959
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5959
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: master
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Assignee: Elliott Clark
> Attachments: HBASE-5959-0.patch, HBASE-5959-1.patch,
> HBASE-5959-2.patch, HBASE-5959-3.patch
>
>
> Now that balancers are pluggable we should give some options.b
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
