[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrew Kyle Purtell updated HBASE-24813:
----------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.3.5)

> ReplicationSource should clear buffer usage on ReplicationSourceManager upon 
> termination
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-24813
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24813
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Replication
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.4.0, 2.2.6, 2.3.4, 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Wellington Chevreuil
>            Assignee: Wellington Chevreuil
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.2.7, 2.5.0, 2.4.1
>
>         Attachments: TestReplicationSyncUpTool.log, 
> image-2020-10-09-10-50-00-372.png
>
>
> Following investigations on the issue described by [~elserj] on HBASE-24779, 
> we found out that once a peer is removed, thus killing peers related 
> *ReplicationSource* instance, it may leave 
> *ReplicationSourceManager.totalBufferUsed* inconsistent. This can happen if 
> *ReplicationSourceWALReader* had put some entries on its queue to be 
> processed by *ReplicationSourceShipper,* but the peer removal killed the 
> shipper before it could process the pending entries. When 
> *ReplicationSourceWALReader* thread add entries to the queue, it increments 
> *ReplicationSourceManager.totalBufferUsed* with the sum of the entries sizes. 
> When those entries are read by *ReplicationSourceShipper,* 
> *ReplicationSourceManager.totalBufferUsed* is then decreased. We should also 
> decrease *ReplicationSourceManager.totalBufferUsed* when *ReplicationSource* 
> is terminated, otherwise those unprocessed entries size would be consuming 
> *ReplicationSourceManager.totalBufferUsed __*indefinitely, unless the RS gets 
> restarted. This may be a problem for deployments with multiple peers, or if 
> new peers are added.**



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to